|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
![]() |
| |
|||||
| |
![]() |
|
» THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF JUSTIFICATION Smith » THE CONSTITUTIVE NATURE OF JUSTIFICATION Murray » N.T. WRIGHT’S ECUMENICAL AGENDA Dyer » NORMAN SHEPHERD & THE THEOLOGY OF JUSTIFICATION VanDrunen |
||
| |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
| |
|||||
Download the entire issue in Portable Document Format (.pdf) here. Full footnotes are included.
If you do not already have the free Adobe PDF Reader, you can get it here. |
|
![]() |
|||
Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful. HEBREWS 10:23 |
|
Why Justification? R.L.
Dabney reminded us that each generation needs to examine and reaffirm
for itself the principal doctrines. One would have thought
that the doctrine of justification was secure, but today the traditional
statement of the doctrine of justification by faith alone is under
attack from a number of directions. In this issue of katekomen we
address two
of the formulations of justification that seem to depart from the biblical,
confessional statement; namely, the positions of Drs. N.T. Wright and
Norman Shepherd. We also include an article by Dr. Morton H. Smith that
states the biblical and confessional doctrine.
Why katekomen? katekomen let
us hold fast, retain, keep. John Owen suggests that the following
ideas are included in the meaning of this word: 1. A supposition
of great difficulty, with danger and opposition, against this holding
the profession of our faith; 2. The putting forth of the utmost of
our strength and endeavors in the defense of it; 3. A constant perseverance
in it, denoted in the word keep; -possess it with constancy. |
|||